SB 483 - Bill Sponsor (2024)

Summary

Prior law, in effect until January 1, 2020, required a sentencing court to impose an additional one-year term for each prior separate prison term or county jail felony term served by the defendant for a nonviolent felony, as specified. Prior law, in effect until January 1, 2018, required a sentencing court to impose on a defendant convicted of specified crimes relating to controlled substances, an additional 3-year term for each prior conviction of specified controlled substances crimes, including possession for sale of opiates, opium derivatives, and hallucinogenic substances, as specified. Existing law limits the imposition of these sentencing enhancements to certain specified circ*mstances.This bill would declare an enhancement imposed pursuant to one of these prior provisions to be legally invalid. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature to prohibit a prosecutor or court from rescinding a plea agreement based on a change in sentence as a result of this measure. The bill would require the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the county correctional administrator of each county to identify those persons in their custody who are serving a sentence that includes one of these enhancements and provide this information to the sentencing court, as specified. The bill would require this information to be provided by March 1, 2022, for those individuals who are currently serving time for the enhancement and by July 1, 2022, for all others. The bill would require the court, after verifying specified information, to recall the sentence and resentence the individual to remove any invalid sentence enhancements. The bill would require the court to grant this relief to those individuals who have served their base term and any other enhancements and are currently serving the enhancement described above by October 1, 2022, and all other individuals by December 31, 2023. The bill would prescribe specific considerations for the court in resentencing, such as requiring that the resentencing result in a lesser sentence, unless the court finds that a lesser sentence would endanger public safety. The bill would require the court to appoint counsel for an individual subject to resentencing.By requiring additional duties of county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursem*nt.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursem*nt for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20212022/SB483/

Record Created

Record Updated